Via the Legal Writing Prof Blog, I learned of a recent talk by Bryan Garner that appears in the current issue of
The Green Bag. I found this piece amusing, and I think that
it should be required reading for any student who is an editor of a law review
or law journal.
One of Garner’s various proposals for rules that
law review editors should enact is a 20-word limit on article titles. Garner provides an example of an article that
violates this rule:
The
Use of Article 31(3)(C) of the VCLT in the Case Law of the ECtHR: An Effective
Antifragmentation Tool or a Selective Loophole for the Reinforcement of Human
Rights Teleology? Between Evolution and Systemic Integration
Garner’s proposal is something that I probably
already implicitly follow. While I do
not count the number of words in the titles of articles I read, I am far less
likely to take an article seriously if my first impression of the article is
something as ungainly as the title above.
In the spirit of Garner’s commentary, I think
that there should be some other rules that govern article titles. The rules I propose are inspired entirely by
this gem that I stumbled upon during my research today:
“Whoever Fights Monsters
Should See To it That in the Process He Does Not Become a Monster” [Footnote]:
Hunting the Sexual Predator With Silver Bullets - Federal Rules of Evidence
413-415 - and a Stake Through the Heart - Kansas v. Hendricks
(49 Fla. L. Rev. 505, 562 (1997)). That entire block of text is the article’s
title. From this single example,
prospective authors can learn several lessons.
·
Bryan Garner’s 20-word limit for titles seems to
be an even better idea than before.
·
You should limit quotes in your title to 10
words (if you for some reason feel the need to include a quote in the first place).
·
While I like Nietzsche as much as the next guy,
if you include a quote in your title, it should be easily recognizable by
readers of all backgrounds…
·
…Because if the quote is not recognizable, you
will be tempted to put a footnote in the
title.
·
Don’t use weird metaphors in your title.
·
And for God’s sake, don’t explain each term of your
title’s metaphor in your title.
No comments:
Post a Comment