Zorn on Five Reasons Why Law Reviews Are Terrible

Christopher Zorn posts here, in a refreshing bit of criticism that touches more on the systematic chaos caused by submission systems like ExpressO rather than on the inferiority of student editors.  I do think that several of Zorn's reasons are a little overstated (for instance, I don't think that articles editors look closely to see if the author's grammatical choices match journal policy in deciding whether to publish the article), but I think that the ExpressO-based concerns deserve attention and have gone largely unmentioned in some of the recent criticism of law reviews.